This article is about the implementation of the principle taught in the previous chapter (link above) by various students. I’m presenting the question statement followed by the responses of various students and related comments.
Question 1: Many people believe that the use of new technology improves the lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Okay, the structure for this question’s introduction can be:
Sentence 1: General statement (a neutral side)
Sentence 2: View 1 – Mention reasons supporting view 1
Sentence 3: View 2 – Mention reasons supporting view 2
Sentence 4: Your view.
This is not the only structure. There can be numerous permutations and combinations. For instance, you can choose to avoid sentence 1. Directly begin with sentence 2. OR you can merge sentences 2 and 3 into a single sentence.
AB: Technological advancements have
has undoubtedly improved employees lives at work (This sentence is supposed to be a general statement where you should not take any sides). There are pros and cons to every development (No need to write this. Directly jump to view 1). I think this has an advantage is advantageous such as it makes work easy and reduced reduces pressure. However, too much dependency reduces personal knowledge.
Technological advancements have altered the manner in which employees work. Some people think this is disadvantageous since this reduces the ability to think and act. I believe this has numerous benefits such as it makes work easy and reduces pressure.
ND: Cutting-edge technology has brought many changes to the lives of people (a neutral sentence). Some believe that it has increased job prospects, while others think it has replaced many workers and has led to unemployment. I agree with the
aforementioned the former/ latter opinion. (there are two opinions mentioned above. Please specify with which opinion do you agree.)
AS: (You’ve chosen to avoid a general statement. That’s perfectly fine.) While some
would people argue that the availability of modern technology has improved the lives of the workforce, others believe that this has negative effects. Although the use of new technology has certain disadvantages, (you’ve already mentioned NEGATIVE EFFECTS in the previous sentence. This is same as disadvantages and counts as repetition. see 1 below) I believe it has definitely improved the lives of the working people (You’ve already mentioned this in the first sentence. see 1 below) by decreasing the exertion.
1. Please note that you have (unintentionally) repeated several statements that you had written earlier. Structure your sentences in a manner that these repetitions are avoided. Let me rephrase your sentence below:
While some people argue that modern technology has improved the lives of workers by reducing physical exertion, others believe that this has negatively impacted the job prospects. (mention the reasons supporting a viewpoint with that viewpoint.) I accord with the former view.
, some people believe that new technology has eased the lives of the employees by making the work more easier and faster . O , others think that it has negatively impacted the lives of workers in the form of manpower reduction and job cut by employer s (, others think that it leads to job losses due to increase in productivity) (2). I agree with the former view.
Note that the right construction is Although X, Y. “Although some people believe ….., others think.” There is a comma, not a period.
2. There are better ways to structure a sentence. Manpower reduction = job cuts.
SK: The present century has witnessed a lot of technological advancements in almost all industries (the general statement is neutral). While a segment of population opines that these advancements
have given a helping hand in ameliorating ameliorate (3) the lives of workers by saving time and reducing workload, others think that these lead to loss of jobs of for workers who have obsolete skills set. I believe in the former view.
3. The use of “ameliorate” is not accurate. You have to use the right context. This word is used to refer to making a bad situation better. But you’ve not mentioned the BAD part. …. that these advancements have ameliorated the poor conditions of workers by reducing work timings and curtailing workload.
SM: Myriads of people have opined that
this fast-paced technology has make made easier lives of workers easier (… technology allows workers to exert less physical energy) by facilitating of different gadgets for their use on daily bases as well now no one is far from anyone (4). However, there is another group of people who which criticises (we need a pronoun to refer to GROUP, not people.) the advancement of this technology because it has not only deprived them of their dear ones but also can cause a massive destruction on a huge level. (5) I believe that both schools of thoughts are right because there are pose pros and cons of it.
4. This is an introduction. You’re not supposed to EXPLAIN how workers lives are getting easier. Reserve this for the body paragraphs. Just mention here how it benefits workers. It will be better if you can write more specifically that easier. Easier does not convey the message clearly.
5. Loss of task response – The question concerns only to the lives of employees. It is not open to the general disadvantages of technology.
Rajoy: The advent of technology has made an alteration in the lifestyle of people (… has radically altered (collocation) the lifestyle of people.). Some people consider this is a disadvantage as it causes unemployment and poverty. I believe that it is beneficial
in a way that since it reduces work burden and stress and save saves time. (maintain parallelism) (General statement, sentence 1 and sentence 2 are well constructed. There is a scope for improvement.)
Question 3. Some people think that children should start school sooner while others believe they should not start it before the age of seven. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
SM: Myriad people argue that
earlier starting to going to a school of children has many advantages for children the earlier the children go to school, the more advantageous it is. However, there are some groups of individuals which criticise on this and claim that age seven is ideal to start school. I have the opinion that nethier too early nor the age of seven to start school is suitable for them, it should be in between. Better structure: Please main object (children) before neither nor construction. (… opinion that children/ they should start school neither too early nor at the age of seven. They should begin somewhere in between.)
The A right direction and channel is are required in shaping the a bright future (collocation) of for children. While some people believe that the kids should start schooling at an elementary young age since they learn very fast in at this age, others think that they must learn social skills at home (If you do not write at home, the idea is incomplete since they can learn these skills in school as well.) first and then start before starting the school at the age of seven. I agree with the former view. (elementary specifically refers to early stages in learning a subject. It can not be used in relation to the age.)
Please subscribe to my Youtube Channel.
Contact me for writing polished and effective Statement of Purpose.
Contact me for Editing Services and Document Writing Services.