Our Motto: LEARNING, not Knowing.
Due to an extremely busy schedule, I am not accepting any student these days. Thank you for visiting this website. I’m sure you will find the content useful.
Why do I need expert guidance in the IELTS exam? I strongly recommend you to read this article. As I’ve highlighted here, going off course even by a small degree leads to serious mistakes during the exam.
I’ve started giving some really beneficial advice to all students under IELTS Tips section. Read some of the interesting articles there and stay tuned for more interesting material.
You can read my book for free on the Juggernaut app. For a website link, please click HERE.
Please subscribe to my Youtube Channel.
You can check out the essays corrections section to find out how my services will help you.
Contact me:
ELTEC English 
Some employers offer their employees membership of gyms and sports club,believing that this will make their staff healthier and more effective at work other employers see no benefit in doing so.Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Employers are always seeking to enhance their employee’s productivity and subsidising health pursuits maybe one way of achieving this .There are arguments on both sides,however,which I will discuss in following paragraphs.
On one hand, it might be said that workers need to be fitter and less stressed which will lead to higher levels of output.It can also be argued that work life balance of the staff will hopefully be improved reason being their leisure time will be more fulfilling.This maybe even more motivating than pay increments ,perks or financial rewards such as bonuses or incentives.Finally, feeling healthier could lead to better job satisfaction which is in itself a encouraging factor.
Conversely, the problem with such leisure subsidies is that their efficacy is virtually impossible to quantify.For example,with target related payments,employers can at least see whether the objectives are reached or not.If this budget was spent on the job training or day release programs,the employees would achieve better career progressions and have better job prospects.These matters are all easier to measure, specially in performance reviews and appraisal and may even help to reduce the risk of redundancy if the company downsizes or outsourcing its workforce.
Overall,it seems that,while health-related subsidies are superficially attractive ,the lack of measurability is a substantial drawback. spending funds on ongoing training would appear to be a better use of company.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Answer Corrections posted here: https://eltecenglish.com/2017/09/26/ielts-essay-correction-gym-and-sports-club-membership-for-employees/
LikeLike
The best way to remove poverty in developing countries is to provide 6 years of free education to all children sot that they can read, write and use numbers. Do you agree or disagree?
It is certainly true that poverty is one of the biggest challenges that growing nations face. In this regard, it is often suggested that providing 6 years of free education to every child is the best step to address this issue. While I believe that free education can be an effective measure to reduce poverty, I will argue that a better option would be to concession in the university fee as well as preferences at job interviews to only those who are underprivileged.
Undoubtedly, free primary education would benefit the citizens, especially those having lack of resources. Being able to read and write would enable them, for example, to read job advertisements and their terms and conditions. Thus, they would be more aware of opportunities that have and can grab them to ameliorate their bad economic conditions.
Moreover, it has been seen that the rich and poor gap is widening since most labourers are not aware of their rights and are duped by their employers by not giving appropriate wages as per norms of the labour class. Therefore, capability to do arithmetic and knowledge of basic rights would definitely help the naive and poor individuals in getting what they deserve.
Nevertheless, the faculty of free education to all citizens regardless of their economic status seems to me as wastage of government resources since most of the rich citizens can afford education with ease for their children. Therefore, it would be more effective use of funds if only the poor are exempted from fees and are given preferences while employment. As such, underprivileged people may get resources to acquire knowledge and skills required for a better, highly paid jobs. Thus, this will help nation to combat with the problem of poverty in a quick and effective manner.
In conclusion, although providing free education is one way to address poverty in developing nations, I believe the most efficient measure would be to provide fee concessions at university level and reservations in jobs.
LikeLike
Hello! Do you have payment option for one essay?
LikeLike
Some people find it beneficial to sent young children to nursery school before sending them to schools, while others think it is better to keep them at home and send directly to a primary school. discuss both views and give your opinion.
In modern time there is an increase in the trend of sending a child to the nursery before getting them enrolled in some primary school. Many are of the opine that this is beneficial for children, while others think that they should be kept at home. I am in favour of sending a child to the nursery before primary schooling starts.
Firstly, when a child goes to nursery at a tender age, the initial shyness from new people is easily overcome as they meet teachers, caretakers and children of their age. Furthermore, the child tends to learn a new technique or mannerism fast, as they see their fellow students doing the same. Secondly, teaching in nursery schools is funny. A child is taught all about alphabets, numbers or days in the visual and colourful form, and as a result, it gives them happiness in learning instead of stress. For instance, if the nursery is supposed to teach rainy season, then they decorate the entire classroom in rainy day theme with the presence of clouds, rainbows and umbrellas. Consequently, a child can correlate all the things and learn too.
On the other hand, if a child is made to stay back at home with elders, they will get a lot of love and care, but the development process of a child is slowed. Foremost reason, a child needs to play with a fellow of same age group despite having an elder sibling because every age requires different type and level of games to keep them busy. To understand it in a better way, a three-year-old child will not be interested or happy in playing cricket with his six-year-old brother. Moreover, the teaching at the house will not be as fun oriented as in schools so it might induce a reluctance to learning new things at an early age.
To conclude, in the nursery a child will make friends and learn and have fun with their peers, so it is good to send them nursery instead of keeping them at home. Although, I believe that love and best care will be given at home rather school but to face society healthily, strong roots can be formed from the nursery.
LikeLike